Aurametrix
  • About
    • Q & A
    • Blog
    • Topics
    • Studies
    • Founders
    • Pipeline

AURAMETRIX

Unraveling the Mysteries of Mischievous Microbiome

0 Comments

 
Picture
Science explains why some people smell worse than others despite keeping themselves squeaky clean. 

The body is crawling with microbes that have evolved with the person, depending on the innate metabolism, history of infections, microbiome swaps, diet and lifestyle. 

The body's ecosystem of microorganisms can increase the risk for dangerous diseases for which we have unreserved levels of sympathy. It can also lead to ​unlikable conditions such as unpredictable and embarrassing outbursts of odor emitting through the pores - odor so bad it ruins social lives and careers. 

Picture
There is no cure for conditions responsible for odorous microbiomes. A rare disease TMAU (Trimethylaminuria) - an inborn error of choline metabolism that leads to the excessive excretion of foul-smelling trimethylamine (TMA) in the sweat and breath  - can sometimes be managed by unhealthy diet very low in choline. A purely-microbiome-caused case of armpit odor may be fixed by microbial transplantation. But research is still in its early stages and is mostly unfunded. 

Our community-led clinical trial was the first study attempting to find what is in common among individuals suffering from odor unexplained by known medical conditions such as TMAU. 

​We have demonstrated that symptoms described by participants are real - as they correlate with a number of laboratory tests. We have also proposed that there are at least two groups of participants with different genetics/medical histories (hence different microbiomes) that may require different types of treatments. 

Unfortunately publishing these results is very difficult - with no funding to cover publication fees and no "sex appeal" to get support from peers. (The article was submitted to the Journal of Participatory Medicine in February, but peer-reviewers still have not returned their reviews)
 
The preprint is now available at bioRxiv and raw results at Mendeley. Study results will be also available on the clinical trials site. 

We hope that the scientific community will look into our findings and support the underserved by their attention. Any comments or suggestions would be of great help!

REFERENCE
Irene S. Gabashvili (2017). Community-led research discovers links between elusive symptoms and clinical tests BiorXiv DOI: 10.1101/139014
0 Comments

Let those who never smelled bad cast the first stone

6 Comments

 
Picture
Analysis of our metabolism is crucial to comprehending the responses of our genes and microbes to the stresses of daily life, and to elucidating the causes and consequences of health and disease. 

And measurement of urinary metabolites - small molecules produced from foods, drinks, drugs, environmental contaminants, bodily waste products and bacterial by-products - 
is key to the analysis.
 
We applied this approach to an elusive condition that has always evaded diagnosis: socially and psychologically distressing odors that occur without a known or apparent cause. 

The figure below summarizes preliminary results of metabolic profiling performed by 
Dr. Wishart's research group, using direct Flow Injection Mass Spectrometry (DI-MS). 

Picture
The first part of our study explored 95 metabolites: biogenic amines (odorous by-products of microbes predicting certain health conditions), amino acids (for diagnostics of endocrine disorders, liver diseases, muscle diseases, neoplastic diseases, neurological disorders, nutritional disturbances, renal failure, and burns), acylcarnitines (biomarkers of fatty acid oxidation disorders and several organic acidurias), phospholipids and sphingolipids (useful in evaluating some enzyme deficiencies) in samples of 15 participants. 

No measurement differed from normal population values - individuals that never complained of any unusual odor problems or other notable medical issues) - even for the "smelliest" compounds such as Putrescine (rotting fish smell) or Spermidine (sperm-like or bleach-like smell). Moreover, average values for these metabolites were actually lower in our cohort, as were values for selected aminoacids, although some aminoacids, biogenic amines and lipids were slightly higher than averages for normal population. So there were definitely significant albeit subtle differences in metabolism between the control and test group, as well as among the participants. 

We combined results for all 95 metabolites using a uniform standard scale. A statistical technique, Principal Component Analysis (PCA), uncovered combinations that best differentiated the participants.  The figure shows that there are at least two or three different types of profiles. Is there something in common between participants in each group? 

Our 
questionnaire shows that there is, and it is not the diet!

Picture
The most significant differences between participants clustered into the groups shown in the figure are their environmental sensitivities  (hence their metabolism) and their symptoms.

Participants from the first group (green dots) had very different diets ranging from plant-based, low choline, low carb and Paleo diets to standard American and junk food diets. They seemed to be more tolerant to sugar than other groups, but more sensitive to dairy/lactose. All participants reported exhibiting sour odors including vinegar, ammonia, fishy and urine-like odors. When the usual odor was less sour (but nonetheless unpleasant), it became more sour with lower blood sugar (for example, with alpha lipoic acid supplements). Chlorophyll supplements  led to a grass- or weed-like smell. This group was similar to the "sour" group from our earlier study in UK (NCT02692495, discussed in this video
). 

The second group (purple dots) was similar to the "sweet" group from the earlier UK study. Participants seemed to be more sensitive to sugar and carbohydrates, and to environmental triggers. Main odors experienced ranged from
fecal, sewage, cheese-like, rubber, burning, tobacco smoke (participants were non-smoking), barn, rotten eggs and mold. Dairy could make odors "cheesier".

The third group was also sensitive to sugar, but the main difference with first and second groups was structural gastrointestinal issues. This group had a different diet from other groups too, it was 98-100% vegan. But further testing is needed before any conclusions can be drawn.

We observed a few other interesting patterns but will wait before commenting on them until more data is collected. 

Meanwhile, if you have never experienced any unpleasant odors in your life, or experienced some that did not affect your social life, you can contribute to our analysis of the human metabolism by participating in this anonymous survey. 

References

Irene S. Gabashvili (2017) Community-led research discovers links between elusive symptoms and clinical tests. Submitted
Bouatra, S., Aziat, F., Mandal, R., Guo, A., Wilson, M., Knox, C., Bjorndahl, T., Krishnamurthy, R., Saleem, F., Liu, P., Dame, Z., Poelzer, J., Huynh, J., Yallou, F., Psychogios, N., Dong, E., Bogumil, R., Roehring, C., & Wishart, D. (2013). The Human Urine Metabolome PLoS ONE, 8 (9) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073076
Irene S. Gabashvili (2017). Raw Data from Clinical Trial NCT02692495 Mendeley Data, 1 DOI: 10.17632/8bk6h6bmkr.1
6 Comments

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    April 2019
    November 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    November 2015
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    March 2015
    November 2014
    September 2014
    June 2014
    April 2014
    February 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    August 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    February 2011
    December 2010
    October 2010
    August 2010
    July 2010
    April 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    July 2009
    May 2009
    April 2009
    March 2009

    Categories

    All
    AI
    Air We Breathe
    Allergies
    Analytics
    Asthma
    Behavioral Health
    Big Data
    Chemical Sensing
    Circadian Rhythms
    COVID19
    COVID19 Vaccines
    Dermatology
    Diagnostics
    Digestion
    Elderly
    Emotions
    Environment
    Exercise
    Food We Eat
    Generations
    Genetics
    Health Management
    Hearing
    Heart Health
    Infections
    Internet Of Things
    Long COVID
    Metabolomics
    Microbiome
    Music
    Odor
    Privacy
    Resolutions
    Seasons
    Security
    Senses
    Sensors
    Technology
    Tricorder
    Vision
    Wearables
    Weather
    Weight Loss

    RSS Feed

    Environment
    Irritable Bowel
    Olfactics
    Technologies

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
  • About
    • Q & A
    • Blog
    • Topics
    • Studies
    • Founders
    • Pipeline